

Preventing HPV? Not for Some People
On Wednesday, October 21, 2009, a federal advisory panel of medical experts recommended that Gardasil, the vaccine developed for women to prevent cervical cancer, be used to vaccinate young boys as well.
Gardasil has been used to immunize women against the human papilloma virus, or HPV, a sexually transmitted disease (STD) that is responsible for 70% of cervical cancer cases. The vaccine also works against strains of the virus that are responsible for genital warts, a fact that incited debates on how cost-effective it would be to administer the vaccine to boys and men, despite the fact that the disease is not life-threatening. However, recent medical information is showing that HPV can also cause cancer in males, meaning Gardasil should be administered to all, right?
Wrong. While the advisory panel, a part of the Center for Disease Control, did “recommend” that Gardasil be given to men, it stopped short of urging doctors to administer it. In fact, the advisory board doesn’t even encourage the vaccine because it can prevent cancer, rather because it can prevent genital warts and the spread of the disease to their (female) partners. Yet a simple Google search reveals that since 2007, reports have been made showing the increase of certain cancers in men, especially oral and anal, that have been caused by HPV. So why hasn’t Merck started testing the effectiveness of its vaccine in men as well as women? Why is it focusing on how cost-effective it is to prevent genital warts instead of terminal illnesses? The answer seems to be rooted in the fact that the chance of getting an HPV-related cancer is about 17 times higher for gay and bisexual men than it is for their straight counterparts.
So how far will this recommendation even go? While the CDC lukewarmly approved the vaccine for men, many insurance companies don’t agree. Ignoring the risk of the fatal anal cancer—the disease Farrah Fawcett died of and which was believed to have been caused by HPV—many who want the vaccine will be forced to spend $130/shot for the three-injection sequence. Not only that, but the vaccine is most effective when given to men and women before they become sexually active, and in a world where some parents fear homosexuality so much that they’d throw their kids out for being gay, how many mothers and fathers will go to the doctor demanding their 9-year-old son, whose sexuality might still be hazy, get vaccinated?
Before we can prevent cancer, we need to eliminate the prejudice we have cultivated in our sexually paranoid society. Whether or not we approve of alternative lifestyles, we need to understand that all lives—gay, straight, rich, poor, male, female, or anything in between—are worth saving, and that a simple vaccine should be available to everyone.
- Christina Squitieri
Sources:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/health/policy/22vaccine.html?_r=1&ref=us
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-453990/Men-cancer-HPV-The-facts-HPV.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22956090/
http://www.webmd.com/sexual-conditions/hpv-genital-warts/hpv-virus-men
Picture courtesy of babble.com

Cola Wars
Have you noticed that Brooklyn College recently replaced all of its Pepsi vending machines with Coca Cola? Are you happy about that? Perhaps many of us are. But not everyone smiles when the famed bottle-bearing polar bear lumbers into their neighborhood; in fact, the citizens of Kala Dera are positively outraged.
Located in the desert state of Rajasthan, India, the community of Kala Dera depends largely on local groundwater for farming and other basic needs. And due to its natural susceptibility to drought, every drop of water is important. But ever since Coca Cola set up shop in the small Indian village in 2000, groundwater levels in the agricultural Kala Dera have been steadily declining. That’s because Coca Cola uses the same groundwater the villagers use to meet company needs. And to make matters worse, the company’s busiest business months are in the summer—when water is ever more vital and scarce. Things came to a head last year, when the India Resource Center obtained government data from the Central Groundwater Board which stated that between May of 2007 and May of 2008, groundwater levels had plunged nineteen feet. Such an abrupt decrease in groundwater levels is unprecedented in Kala Dera history. But Coca Cola did not apologize.
Various community groups, such as Kala Dera Sangharsh Samiti, have been protesting Coca Cola’s actions in their hometown. "The Coca-Cola Company is denying our fundamental human right to water by continuing to extract groundwater from a rapidly falling aquifer. Every drop of water that Coca-Cola extracts from the groundwater is water taken away from the children, women, and men who are unable to meet their basic water needs, leave alone the farmers who are seeing their crops fail," declares one group member, Mahesh Yogi. "Coca-Cola has contributed significantly to the falling water tables and they must shut down and leave Kala Dera."
Others have joined the cause, but fighting a huge corporation like Coca Cola is not easy. When famed Indian photographer Sharad Haksar displayed the above picture—a billboard that depicts empty jugs beside a water pump in front of a Coca Cola sign—the soft drink company attempted to sue him. And when mainstream media refused to pick up the story because Coke was too valuable a sponsor to lose, Haksar barely stood a chance. But outraged bloggers picked up the story and the negative publicity prompted Coca Cola to drop the charges.
But it didn’t prompt them to leave Kala Dera.
In spite of a 2008 study funded by the Coca Cola company which confirmed that the company is a significant contributor to the drought, in spite of its very own study which recommended that Coca Cola either shut down or import water from other areas to fuel the company, and in spite of all arguments against the makers of the soft drink, Coca Cola stays. In fact, on the Coca Cola India website, the company advertises itself as green environmentalist company that brings water to drought- prone areas, a claim deemed ridiculous by the community, the government, and the India Resource Center. So a large corporation continues to thrive at the expense of a small community.
Granted, a large corporation is a formidable foe. But if the public was able to successfully convince Coca Cola to drop the charges against Haksar, perhaps we, the people, can take it a bit further and convince the corporation owners to move their enterprise elsewhere. To support global justice and take action, go to this link: http://www.indiaresource.org/
- Rachel Weissman
Sources: http://www.indiaresource.org/campaigns/coke/2009/kaladeragroundwater.html
http://www.coca-colaindia.com/
Photo Source: http://www.powerofculture.nl/en/current/2005/august/haksar.html

Fossilized Discovery
In 1915, a German meteorologist and geophysicist named Albert Wegner created the hypothesis of continental drift. He believed that the world was once a supercontinent, dubbing it Pangaea (“all land”). He also believed that around 200 million years ago Pangaea began to drift apart into smaller continents. Wegner and other individuals supported these beliefs by finding an allotment of fossils, structures of rocks and ancient climates on both Africa and South America which indicates that these two landmasses were once united. Now, in 2009, another fossil discovery has been made which may assist Wegner’s idea of Pangaea.
On October 27, a fossilized skull of the giant sea creature called pliosaur was found on the southern coast of Dorchester, England. The skull was discovered by a collector and measures 8 feet in length. Scientists are now speculating that the reptile would have been 52 feet long. This discovery will be put on display in the Dorset museum.
In 2006 on the Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard, parts of the pliosaur’s skeleton and other bone fragments were discovered weathering on the side of a mountain. Dr. Patrick Druckenmiller, a plesiosaur specialist at the University of Alaska Museum, said, “Not only is this specimen significant in that it is one of the largest and relatively complete pliosaurs ever found, it also demonstrates that these gigantic animals inhabited the northern seas of our planet during the age of dinosaurs."
The pliosaur is a type of plesiosaur, marine reptiles that existed in the Jurassic and Cretaceous Periods around 150 million years ago. These sea reptiles were identified by having short necks and elongated skulls. They were carnivorous creatures, evident by their long, powerful jaws which contained sharp, conical teeth. David Martill, a paleontologist from the University of Portsmouth, stated the pliosaur “used paddle-like limbs to propel their bodies through the water.”
The findings of this huge sea creature express that even as much as we have learned about the world before our time, there is still more to be discovered. Also, Wegner may have been correct that Pangaea once existed. As the world unveils its secrets to us, the puzzle of the world we live in slowly begins to merge together.
- Alana Linchner
Sources:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33497627/ns/technology_and_science-science/
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080229101002.htm
Image Source:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33497627/ns/technology_and_science-science/